Desensitized Case / Scheelite

Rougher verification on a low-grade scheelite plant pulp

Using plant pulp and comparable rougher conditions, HB-1/HB-2 single-reagent and blended schemes were compared across multiple tests to evaluate WO3 recovery, enrichment ratio and collector dosage window.

Trial Background

Judging plant adaptability through repeated comparison, not one-point optimization

The verification focused on low-grade scheelite roughing. With plant pulp and comparable depressant conditions, repeated tests across different blends and dosages showed that HB-1/HB-2 can provide a clear industrial adjustment window between higher recovery and controlled enrichment.

Recovery windowabout 89-94%

Higher WO3 rougher recovery under recovery-priority conditions

Low-dosage test120-180 g/t

About 85-88% recovery with high enrichment in the lower dosage range

Enrichment ratioup to about 8.6x

Strong enrichment under selectivity-oriented conditions

Data basismulti-set

Repeated plant-pulp comparisons under comparable rougher conditions

01

Two operating objectives

Recovery-priority conditions amplify scheelite floatability, while enrichment-priority conditions use blend and dosage control to protect rougher concentrate quality.

02

Visible dosage path

Good rougher indicators were maintained after lowering collector dosage, leaving room for plant-scale optimization and cost control.

03

Depressant synergy

Depressant conditions affect rougher yield, grade and enrichment ratio, so scheelite collection must be evaluated with gangue depression and froth behavior.

Back to Scheelite Product